Modal vs Beam
BE| BEBeam | ||
|---|---|---|
| Isolation | gVisor | Container |
| Cold start | 800ms | n/a |
| Price / vCPU-hr | $0.14 | n/a |
| GPU | T4 → B200, incl. H100 | H100 $1.74/hr, A100 80GB $1.30/hr, RTX 4090 $0.42/hr |
| Session limit | Configurable | Configurable |
| Persistence | Volumes; ephemeral compute | Ephemeral sandboxes; volume storage |
| MCP support | n/a | n/a |
| Free tier | $30/mo free credits | $30/mo free credits, no subscription floor |
| Best for | Python/ML workloads and agents that need GPU inside the sandbox. | Agents that need GPUs inside the sandbox, or spiky usage a subscription floor would penalize. |
The verdict
Choose Modal for Python/ML workloads and agents that need GPU inside the sandbox. Choose Beam for agents that need GPUs inside the sandbox, or spiky usage a subscription floor would penalize.
Headline rates rarely equal your bill. Idle time, session length, creation fees and GPU minutes dominate. Model your actual workload in the cost calculator.
FAQ
Modal vs Beam: which is better?
It depends on your priority. Modal is best for Python/ML workloads and agents that need GPU inside the sandbox. Beam is best for agents that need GPUs inside the sandbox, or spiky usage a subscription floor would penalize.
Is Modal or Beam cheaper?
Pricing models differ; see each provider's page for current rates.
Still choosing between Modal and Beam?
Tell us your workload and we'll point you to the better fit, then connect you with real pricing from the one you pick. No spam.